Thursday, September 4, 2008

Patriotism (paraphrasing Schuon)

...Furthermore, there is Fatherland and there is fatherland, that is, there is the Kingdom of God, universal, all-pervading and all-encompassing and our homeland and “our people” or our social class, or our group whose interests are unavoidably selfish, self-centered and more often than not, materialistic in essence, that is, confined to the infra-human end of the human scale. When the Fatherland had the authority and prevailed over the fatherland (and certainly, that moral authority had started to erode long before the fourteenth century), God bestowed a quasi-sacred character onto a nation or ethnic collectivity and therefore gave a divine justification to its claim on absoluteness (one should note that some archaic people, such as the American Indians, the Australian Aborigines or the ancient Shinto Japanese used to call themselves “The People”, appropriating exclusively, in what would seem today at least a bizarre manner, the quality of humanness).
The kingdom of God should take precedence over the kingdoms of men not because religions dictate so but because it is imperiously necessary for our happiness — here, and hereafter. “God cannot primarily ‘take an interest’ in the well-being of creatures, since He wants their soul and their imperishable good and not the transitory things of the material world. If God also wants our earthly well-being is not because He regards it as an end in itself but because a certain happiness is the normal condition of man who, however, is essentially created with a view to eternal values. God takes interest in our well-being to the extent that we may profit from it in view of Him, and not otherwise; but outside this ‘interest’ – if this word be permissible here in a provisional way – God ;sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust’” (Frithjof Schuon — The Transfiguration of Man).